Constraining the time span between the Early Holocene Hässeldalen and Askja‐S Tephras through varve counting in the Lake Czechowskie sediment record, Poland

ABSTRACT We report the first findings of coexisting early Holocene Hässeldalen and Askja‐S cryptotephras in a varved sediment record in Lake Czechowskie (Poland). A time span of 152 +11/−8 varve years between the two tephras has been revealed by differential dating through varve counting. This is in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Quaternary Science
Main Authors: Ott, Florian, Wulf, Sabine, Serb, Johanna, Słowiński, Michał, Obremska, Milena, Tjallingii, Rik, Błaszkiewicz, Mirosław, Brauer, Achim
Other Authors: Virtual Institute of Integrated Climate and Landscape Evolution Analyses (ICLEA)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jqs.2844
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjqs.2844
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jqs.2844
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT We report the first findings of coexisting early Holocene Hässeldalen and Askja‐S cryptotephras in a varved sediment record in Lake Czechowskie (Poland). A time span of 152 +11/−8 varve years between the two tephras has been revealed by differential dating through varve counting. This is in agreement within the uncertainties with calculations from radiocarbon‐based age models from the non‐varved Hässeldala port record in southern Sweden, but shorter than assumed from the non‐varved lake record on the Faroe Islands. We discuss possible reasons for the observed differences in duration between the two tephras and provide a revised absolute age for the Askja‐S tephra of 11 228 ± 226 cal a BP based on anchoring our floating varve chronology to the absolute timescale by using the Hässeldalen Tephra as dated in the Hässeldala port sediments (11 380 ± 216 cal a BP). This age agrees with radiocarbon age models with larger uncertainty ranges, but is slightly older than radiocarbon‐based age models with narrow uncertainty bands and is even 200–300 years older than the age reported from the Faroe Islands record. In addition to these chronological issues we discuss the possible response of the Czechowskie sediment record to the Preboreal climate oscillation.