Mid‐MIS3 climate inferred from reconstructing the Dalijia Shan ice cap, north‐eastern Tibetan Plateau
ABSTRACT The local last glacial maximum (LGM L ) on Dalijia Shan occurred during mid‐marine isotope stage 3 (MIS3), which is consistent with some Tibetan Plateau records, but asynchronous with the MIS2 global Last Glacial Maximum (LGM G ). Paleoclimatic reconstructions are key to advancing understan...
Published in: | Journal of Quaternary Science |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jqs.2802 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjqs.2802 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jqs.2802 |
Summary: | ABSTRACT The local last glacial maximum (LGM L ) on Dalijia Shan occurred during mid‐marine isotope stage 3 (MIS3), which is consistent with some Tibetan Plateau records, but asynchronous with the MIS2 global Last Glacial Maximum (LGM G ). Paleoclimatic reconstructions are key to advancing understanding such spatial and temporal patterns of paleoglaciation. Using multiple methods we reconstructed mid‐MIS3 equilibrium‐line altitude (ELA) on Dalijia Shan and inferred temperature depressions. Geomorphic ELA reconstructions combined with empirical data on current ELA temperature and precipitation yield a mid‐MIS3 ELA of 4000 ± 78 m a.s.l. (618–851 m lower than current, and a temperature depression of 3.3–6.8 °C). Independent glacial modeling using the degree‐day approach suggests a mid‐MIS3 ELA between 3971 and 4024 m a.s.l. and a temperature depression of 4.2–5.6 °C. The consistency of these results indicate that mid‐MIS3 temperature depressions in the Dalijia Shan region were 3.3–6.8 °C, which is less than the LGM G temperature depression inferred from regional climatic proxy data. Combined with other proxy data, this suggests that the LGM L glacial advance in Dalijia Shan resulted from lower temperatures and slightly reduced precipitation compared with present, whereas the LGM G advance was more restricted because much colder conditions were combined with much lower precipitation. |
---|