A 10 Be production‐rate calibration for the Arctic

• Published in: Journal of Quaternary Science
• Main Authors: YOUNG, NICOLÁs E., SCHAEFER, JOERG M., BRINER, JASON P., GOEHRING, BRENT M.
• Other Authors: US National Science Foundation, J. M. S. acknowledges the Comer Science and Educational Foundation, the Lamont Climate Center and NSF-EAR, LDEO
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2013
• Subjects: Baffin Bay; Baffin Island; Baffin; Greenland; Greenland ice cores; Jakobshavn
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jqs.2642; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fjqs.2642; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jqs.2642

ABSTRACT We present a Baffin Bay 10 Be production‐rate calibration derived from glacial deposits in western Greenland and Baffin Island, and test our results against published 10 Be calibration datasets to develop an Arctic 10 Be production rate. Our calibration comprises: (i) 10 Be measurements from moraine boulders linked to a 14 C‐dated moraine at Jakobshavn Isfjord in western Greenland, (ii) an independent and previously published 10 Be production rate at Jakobshavn Isfjord and (iii) re‐measured 10 Be concentrations from a Baffin Island calibration site that is included in the north‐eastern North America dataset. Combined, we calculate a sea‐level/high‐latitude 10 Be production rate for the Baffin Bay region of 3.96 ± 0.07 atoms g −1 a −1 (Lal/Stone scaling model). After testing the Baffin Bay rate against calibration sites in Norway and north‐eastern North America, we calculate a more conservative Arctic production rate of 3.96 ± 0.15 atoms g −1 a −1 . The Baffin Bay and Arctic 10 Be production rates are indistinguishable from the north‐eastern North America 10 Be production rate (3.91 ± 0.19 atoms g −1 a −1 ) and yield overall uncertainties of <2–3.7% (1σ). These production rates reduce systematic uncertainties in 10 Be‐based chronologies of ice‐margin change and allow 10 Be‐based chronologies to be more confidently compared with high‐resolution climate records, such as those from Greenland ice cores.