Assessment of Antarctic sea ice area and concentration in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 and Phase 6 models

• Published in: International Journal of Climatology
• Main Authors: Casagrande, Fernanda, Stachelski, Letícia, de Souza, Ronald Buss
• Other Authors: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2023
• Subjects: Amundsen Sea; Antarc*; Antarctic; Antarctica; Bellingshausen Sea; Ross Sea; Sea ice; Weddell Sea
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joc.7916; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/joc.7916; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/joc.7916; https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/joc.7916

Abstract Sea ice is an important and complex component of the Earth system and is considered a sensitive indicator of climate change. The seasonal sea ice cycle regulates the exchange of heat and salinity, altering the energy balance between high and low latitudes as well as the ocean and atmospheric circulation. The accurate representation of Antarctic sea ice has been considered a hot topic in the climate modelling community and lacks conclusive answers. In this paper, we evaluated the ability of 11 climate models from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 ( CMIP5) and Phase 6 ( CMIP6) to simulate the sea ice seasonal cycle in Antarctica in terms of area ( SIA ) and concentration ( SIC ), as well as the improvements in the most recent models' version, submitted to CMIP6 . The results indicated that all models are able to accurately capture the seasonal cycle of the Antarctic SIA , with the minimum (maximum) occurring in February (September). In the Weddell Sea, Amundsen Sea, Bellingshausen Sea, and the Ross Sea, the simulated sea ice concentration revealed a large and systematic bias in February when compared to observations. In September, a large and systematic bias was found nearby the Southern Ocean's northern limit in the Polar Front. Several CMIP6 models exhibited slight improvements on the SIA and SIC estimate over the previous version ( CMIP5 ). All models indicated a significant sea ice loss in the coming years as a response to CO 2 forcing. Despite the advancements in the sea ice representation, our findings show that the models are still unable to accurately represent the regional sea ice changes