230 Th dating of flowstone from Ignatievskaya Cave, Russia: Age constraints of rock art and paleoclimate inferences

Abstract Paleolithic antiquity of parietal art in Ignatievskaya cave, Southern Ural, is supported by its subject (Late Pleistocene animals) as well as by paleontological and palynological data, and 14 C dates from cultural layers associated with artistic activity (17.8−16.3 cal ka BP; association is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geoarchaeology
Main Authors: Dublyansky, Yuri, Shirokov, Vladimir, Moseley, Gina E., Kosintsev, Pavel A., Edwards, R. Lawrence, Spötl, Christoph
Other Authors: Austrian Science Fund
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021
Subjects:
Ochre
permafrost
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gea.21851
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/gea.21851
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/gea.21851
Description
Summary:Abstract Paleolithic antiquity of parietal art in Ignatievskaya cave, Southern Ural, is supported by its subject (Late Pleistocene animals) as well as by paleontological and palynological data, and 14 C dates from cultural layers associated with artistic activity (17.8−16.3 cal ka BP; association is established by finds of ochre in these layers). However, three 14 C dates of charcoal motifs yielded younger, Holocene ages (7.4−6.0 cal ka BP). In this study, we constrain the age of parietal art in the cave by 230 Th dating of flowstone that brackets the paintings. Flowstone did not form in the cave between c. 78 and 10 ka BP, due to widespread permafrost in northern Eurasia at that time. Our 230 Th dates do not support the middle Holocene age of art in Ignatievskaya cave and are consistent with its Upper Paleolithic antiquity instead.

Similar Items