The micromorphology of loess‐paleosol sequences in central Alaska: A new perspective on soil formation and landscape evolution since the Late Glacial period (c. 16,000 cal yr BP to present)

• Published in: Geoarchaeology
• Main Authors: Kielhofer, Jennifer, Miller, Christopher, Reuther, Joshua, Holmes, Charles, Potter, Ben, Lanoë, François, Esdale, Julie, Crass, Barbara
• Other Authors: National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs Arctic Social Sciences Program
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2020
• Subjects: Subarctic; Alaska
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gea.21807; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fgea.21807; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/gea.21807; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/gea.21807

Abstract The middle Tanana Valley of central Alaska contains a well‐preserved record of human occupation and paleoenvironmental change since the Late Glacial period (c. 16,000 cal yr BP) and is a critical region for understanding human dispersal into the Americas. Micromorphology analysis of soils and sediments from six archaeological sites yields valuable information about soil formation processes and landscape evolution during the Late Glacial and into the Holocene. At the macroscale, site stratigraphies are very similar, and thin organic‐rich layers (locally known as “stringers”) are commonly interpreted as buried soils. However, at the microscale, these layers exhibit significant differences in the degree of bioturbation, organic matter humification, and boundary abruptness, indicating that pedogenesis was not the sole process at every site. In this way, our microscale analysis addresses issues of equifinality related to site formation interpretations, a persistent problem with subarctic and high‐latitude stratigraphy. Additionally, this study reveals a certain level of landform and landscape instability within a broader trend of regional increases in pedogenesis and vegetation coverage, adding to the existing model of heterogeneity across this subarctic landscape. Here we demonstrate the utility of micromorphology to test field interpretations and improve models of Late Glacial landscape evolution in high‐latitude contexts.