Transient top‐down and bottom‐up effects of resources pulsed to multiple trophic levels

• Published in: Ecology
• Main Authors: McCary, Matthew A., Phillips, Joseph S., Ramiadantsoa, Tanjona, Nell, Lucas A., McCormick, Amanda R., Botsch, Jamieson C.
• Other Authors: Division of Graduate Education, Division of Environmental Biology
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2020
• Subjects: Mývatn; Iceland; Subarctic
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3197; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ecy.3197; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ecy.3197; https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/am-pdf/10.1002/ecy.3197; https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ecy.3197

Abstract Pulsed fluxes of organisms across ecosystem boundaries can exert top‐down and bottom‐up effects in recipient food webs, through both direct effects on the subsidized trophic levels and indirect effects on other components of the system. While previous theoretical and empirical studies demonstrate the influence of allochthonous subsidies on bottom‐up and top‐down processes, understanding how these forces act in conjunction is still limited, particularly when an allochthonous resource can simultaneously subsidize multiple trophic levels. Using the Lake Mývatn region in Iceland as an example system of allochthony and its potential effects on multiple trophic levels, we analyzed a mathematical model to evaluate how pulsed subsidies of aquatic insects affect the dynamics of a soil–plant–arthropod food web. We found that the relative balance of top‐down and bottom‐up effects on a given food web compartment was determined by trophic position, subsidy magnitude, and top predators’ ability to exploit the subsidy. For intermediate trophic levels (e.g., detritivores and herbivores), we found that the subsidy could either alleviate or intensify top‐down pressure from the predator. For some parameter combinations, alleviation and intensification occurred sequentially during and after the resource pulse. The total effect of the subsidy on detritivores and herbivores, including top‐down and bottom‐up processes, was determined by the rate at which predator consumption saturated with increasing size of the allochthonous subsidy, with greater saturation leading to increased bottom‐up effects. Our findings illustrate how resource pulses to multiple trophic levels can influence food web dynamics by changing the relative strength of bottom‐up and top‐down effects, with bottom‐up predominating top‐down effects in most scenarios in this subarctic system.