Nesting population origins of leatherback turtles caught as bycatch in the U.S. pelagic longline fishery
Abstract Fisheries that operate at large spatial scales and with high intensity have the potential to impact highly migratory species, and it is important to characterize threats to specific breeding populations of these species. We used many‐to‐many mixed‐stock analysis ( MSA ) ( n = 408) and micro...
Published in: | Ecosphere |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1272 https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fecs2.1272 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ecs2.1272 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ecs2.1272 https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ecs2.1272 |
Summary: | Abstract Fisheries that operate at large spatial scales and with high intensity have the potential to impact highly migratory species, and it is important to characterize threats to specific breeding populations of these species. We used many‐to‐many mixed‐stock analysis ( MSA ) ( n = 408) and microsatellite assignment testing ( n = 397) to determine source populations for leatherback turtles ( Dermochelys coriacea ) caught as bycatch in the U.S. pelagic longline fishery from 2002 to 2012 in the western North Atlantic. Within the United States, we had bycatch samples from the majority of statistical fishing areas: Gulf of Mexico ( GOM ), Northeast Distant ( NED ), Caribbean ( CAR ), Florida East Coast ( FEC ), Mid Atlantic Bight ( MAB ), Northeast Coastal ( NEC ), South Atlantic Bight ( SAB ) and Sargasso ( SAR ). We determined the proportions of turtles from each of nine nesting stocks in the Atlantic in each of the sampled areas. These nesting stocks included Brazil, Costa Rica, Florida, Trinidad, French Guiana, St. Croix, Ghana, Gabon, and South Africa. The MSA revealed that the NED had a lower relative proportion of turtles from Costa Rica than other areas and that the GOM had the highest relative proportion of turtles from Costa Rica. No turtles were assigned to the African rookeries, lending further evidence that turtles from that region forage elsewhere and therefore may not be affected by western North Atlantic fisheries. This work contributes to the ongoing assessment of threats to leatherback turtles in the Regional Management Unit ( RMU ) of the western North Atlantic, and draws attention to the disproportionate number of turtles from Costa Rica being caught in the Gulf of Mexico; Costa Rica is one of the only populations in the northern Atlantic that is not experiencing significant increases in nest numbers. This approach should be useful in determining population‐specific threats to other highly migratory protected species that may depend on segregated foraging areas either within or among species. |
---|