Brooding duration does not depend on cat predation risk but is related to weather and phenology in the wandering albatross ( Diomedea exulans)
Abstract Parental investment increases offspring fitness at the expense of the parent's ability to invest in other offspring. In many animal species, parents guard their offspring after birth. The parental decision over the duration of this period is expected to be triggered by the associated f...
| Published in: | Ecology and Evolution |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70174 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.70174 |
| Summary: | Abstract Parental investment increases offspring fitness at the expense of the parent's ability to invest in other offspring. In many animal species, parents guard their offspring after birth. The parental decision over the duration of this period is expected to be triggered by the associated fitness costs and benefits for both offspring and parents. Here, we evaluated the relevance of several intrinsic and environmental variables in determining brooding period duration in the wandering albatross ( Diomedea exulans ) and questioned whether brooding duration was related to chick subsequent survival and biometry prior to fledging. We used a semi‐experimental design to increase the variance in cat abundance, a recent predator of albatross chicks, and predicted that an increased predation risk at the nest scale would trigger longer chick brooding and thus, protection. In addition, we questioned the influence of weather conditions, hatching date, and characteristics of chicks (sex and biometry) and parents (sex and age) on brooding duration. We report no effect of predation risk or parental characteristics on brooding duration. However, the probability for a parent to end brooding decreased with forthcoming unfavorable weather. Our data also revealed reduced brooding duration for late‐hatched chicks and a positive association between brooding duration and chick structural size, and between the frequency of shifts between parents and chick structural size. Finally, brooding duration was not associated with chick survival or with chick biometry prior to fledging. We discuss these results in light of pre‐existing hypotheses on fitness costs and benefits associated with brooding duration for chicks and parents. |
|---|