Multiple generalist morphs of Lake Trout: Avoiding constraints on the evolution of intraspecific divergence?

• Published in: Ecology and Evolution
• Main Authors: Chavarie, Louise, Harford, William J., Howland, Kimberly L., Fitzsimons, John, Muir, Andrew M., Krueger, Charles C., Tonn, William M.
• Other Authors: Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Association of Canadian Universities for Research in Astronomy
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2016
• Subjects: Arctic; Great Bear Lake; Lake May
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2506; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fece3.2506; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.2506

Abstract A generalist strategy, as an adaptation to environmental heterogeneity, is common in Arctic freshwater systems, often accompanied, however, by intraspecific divergence that promotes specialization in niche use. To better understand how resources may be partitioned in a northern system that supports intraspecific diversity of Lake Trout, trophic niches were compared among four shallow‐water morphotypes in Great Bear Lake (N65 ° 56′ 39″, W120 ° 50′ 59″). Bayesian mixing model analyses of stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen were conducted on adult Lake Trout. Major niche overlap in resource use among four Lake Trout morphotypes was found within littoral and pelagic zones, which raises the question of how such polymorphism can be sustained among opportunistic generalist morphotypes. Covariances of our morphological datasets were tested against δ 13 C and δ 15 N values. Patterns among morphotypes were mainly observed for δ 15 N. This link between ecological and morphological differentiation suggested that selection pressure(s) operate at the trophic level (δ 15 N), independent of habitat, rather than along the habitat‐foraging opportunity axis (δ 13 C). The spatial and temporal variability of resources in Arctic lakes, such as Great Bear Lake, may have favored the presence of multiple generalists showing different degrees of omnivory along a weak benthic–pelagic gradient. Morphs 1–3 had more generalist feeding habits using both benthic and pelagic habitats than Morph 4, which was a top‐predator specialist in the pelagic habitat. Evidence for frequent cannibalism in Great Bear Lake was found across all four morphotypes and may also contribute to polymorphism. We suggest that the multiple generalist morphs described here from Great Bear Lake are a unique expression of diversity due to the presumed constraints on the evolution of generalists and contrast with the development of multiple specialists, the standard response to intraspecific divergence.