Assessment of commercial hydrate inhibitors using the 3‐in‐1 method
Abstract Phase equilibria, kinetics, and morphology studies of gas hydrates require separate pieces of equipment and experimentation times in the order of days. Recently, we designed a reactor that allows for tight control of the crystallization temperature. Coupled with a novel method, this reactor...
| Published in: | The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Other Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.23611 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cjce.23611 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/cjce.23611 |
| Summary: | Abstract Phase equilibria, kinetics, and morphology studies of gas hydrates require separate pieces of equipment and experimentation times in the order of days. Recently, we designed a reactor that allows for tight control of the crystallization temperature. Coupled with a novel method, this reactor can screen the crystal morphology, phase equilibria, and apparent kinetics of gas hydrates. Compared to traditional multi‐trial methods, the main advantage of this method is that only a single experiment, completed in the order of hours, is required to assess: (a) the change in hydrate growth velocity with respect to temperature, (b) the HLV equilibrium temperature at the experimental pressure, and (c) the change in crystal morphology with respect to driving force. Using this 3‐in‐1 method, methane hydrate growth and dissociation was studied in the presence of four commercial inhibitors. Phase equilibria, kinetics, and morphology were obtained for all hydrate systems with inhibitors. The standard uncertainty for the HLV equilibrium temperature was 0.05 K and for pressure 0.005 MPa. The apparent rates of growth were measured for all systems (standard uncertainty was 0.008 mm · s −1 ) and the difference between the inhibited systems and the pure system was very clear. Crystal habits varied considerably among inhibitors and radically with respect to the uninhibited system. Overall, we present an innovative technology to assess the morphology, kinetics, and thermodynamics of hydrate forming systems with a single apparatus. Furthermore, with little time investment, small sample sizes can be used to obtain replicates with minimum temperature and pressure uncertainties. |
|---|