Cobble reef restoration in the Baltic Sea: Implications for life below water

Abstract Many coastal ecosystems are impacted by human pressures. Rocky reefs are structurally complex habitats that often support elevated fish abundance and marine biodiversity. In the Baltic Sea, rocky reefs have suffered from extraction for decades, leading to a decrease in hard substrata and co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Main Authors: Casabona, E., Wilms, T., Moltesen, M., Bertelsen, J. L., Kruse, B. M., Flávio, H., Holloway, P., Svendsen, J. C.
Other Authors: European Commission, European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, Fiskeristyrelsen, Velux Stiftung, Vattenfall
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4216
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/aqc.4216
Description
Summary:Abstract Many coastal ecosystems are impacted by human pressures. Rocky reefs are structurally complex habitats that often support elevated fish abundance and marine biodiversity. In the Baltic Sea, rocky reefs have suffered from extraction for decades, leading to a decrease in hard substrata and complex habitat availability. This study is the first to restore cobble reefs and examine the biological effects. Baited and unbaited underwater video systems (BRUVS and UBRUVS, respectively) were employed across five years to monitor fish communities before reef deployment in 2017 and after reef deployment in 2018 and 2021. Using a before–after control‐impact (BACI) study design with replicates, relative abundances of Atlantic cod ( Gadus morhua ) , herring ( Clupeidae sp.), goldsinny wrasse ( Ctenolabrus rupestris ), two‐spotted goby ( Pomatoschistus flavescens ), shore crab ( Carcinus maenas ), and flatfish ( Pleuronectiformes spp. ) were compared across time and test sites. Comparisons were conducted across 1) restored cobble reefs, 2) natural cobble reefs, and 3) sand‐bottom test sites. This study found positive reef restoration effects revealed consistently by BRUVS and UBRUVS in three species: Atlantic cod, goldsinny wrasse and two‐spotted goby. These findings indicate that A) it is possible to restore cobble reefs and the associated mobile fauna, but also that B) continued marine extraction of cobble degrades complex habitats to the detriment of various marine species. To preserve Atlantic cod, and other sensitive species, we emphasize ecosystem restoration and warn against marine cobble reef extraction in vulnerable areas. Restoration of marine habitats may contribute to achieving the UN sustainable development goal covering life below water.