Dimensional and discrete dental trait asymmetry relationships

Abstract Inuit (Eskimos) from the Foxe Basin region of the Northwest Territories, Canada, were studied to ascertain the amount of dimensional and morphological asymmetry in their dentitions. The results indicate that dimensional asymmetry does not appear to be greater on either the maxillary or mand...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Main Authors: Mayhall, John T., Saunders, Shelley R.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1986
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330690311
https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1002%2Fajpa.1330690311
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ajpa.1330690311
Description
Summary:Abstract Inuit (Eskimos) from the Foxe Basin region of the Northwest Territories, Canada, were studied to ascertain the amount of dimensional and morphological asymmetry in their dentitions. The results indicate that dimensional asymmetry does not appear to be greater on either the maxillary or mandibular teeth. Both types of asymmetry show partial conformity to the model of tooth fields with an increasing amount of asymmetry as one goes distally in each tooth group. The morphological asymmetry exception, the mandibular incisors, follows Dahlberg's “Field Concept.” Rank‐order correlations between the amount of dimensional asymmetry and morphological asymmetry reveal no detectable patterns. There appear to be no associations between the presence or absence of morphological asymmetry and the size of the tooth. This lack of association might be explained by differences in developmental timing of tooth dimensions and morphological traits; however, such a hypothesis requires experimental testing. In this population and those for which published results are available, it is practically impossible to overcome the “noise” level and test recent hypotheses regarding random dental asymmetry.