Elevated resting metabolic rates among female, but not male, reindeer herders from subarctic Finland
Abstract Objective Elevated resting metabolic rates (RMR, kcal/day) are a well‐established mechanism for maintaining core body temperature among cold climate populations. A high degree of interindividual variation has recently been noted among circumpolar populations. To further examine RMR variabil...
| Published in: | American Journal of Human Biology |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23432 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ajhb.23432 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ajhb.23432 |
| Summary: | Abstract Objective Elevated resting metabolic rates (RMR, kcal/day) are a well‐established mechanism for maintaining core body temperature among cold climate populations. A high degree of interindividual variation has recently been noted among circumpolar populations. To further examine RMR variability, we investigated anthropometric and metabolic differences among reindeer herders from subarctic Finland. Methods Resting metabolic rates, body mass, body composition, height, age, and sex were measured among 20 reindeer herders (5 females, 15 males, 20‐64 years) from seven herding districts surrounding the Arctic Circle of Finland in January of 2019. Results Females had a mean RMR of 1798 ± 216 kcal/day and males 1753 ± 503 kcal/day. When controlling for body mass and fat‐free mass, females had significantly higher RMRs relative to males ( P < .01). Contrary to previous cold climate population studies, measured RMR among males was not significantly different from predictive equation estimates ( P > .05). However, predictive equations significantly underestimated female RMR by a mean of 25.2% ± 5.9% ( P < .01). Conclusion These results mirror earlier findings, though in ways previously unseen. In this population: (a) There is a high degree of RMR interindividual variability, but only among males, and (b) there is evidence for elevated RMR, but only among females. Though the sample size is small, preliminary results suggest the presence of sex‐based differences in metabolic adaptations to cold climates within this population subset. Potential reasons for this sex‐based difference are discussed including a presentation of a hypothesis about the dual role of thyroid hormone in both reproductive and metabolic processes. |
|---|