Why have studies of tailored anti-platelet therapy failed so far?
Summary Published data linking clopidogrel non-responsiveness to adverse ischaemic events lead to the suggestion that the magnitude of platelet inhibition by clopidogrel can be monitored and individually adjusted. This has been tested in randomised clinical trials (ARCTIC, GRAVITAS and TRIGGER-PCI),...
| Published in: | Thrombosis and Haemostasis |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1160/th13-03-0250 http://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1160/TH13-03-0250.pdf |
| Summary: | Summary Published data linking clopidogrel non-responsiveness to adverse ischaemic events lead to the suggestion that the magnitude of platelet inhibition by clopidogrel can be monitored and individually adjusted. This has been tested in randomised clinical trials (ARCTIC, GRAVITAS and TRIGGER-PCI), but despite reducing platelet reactivity, a strategy of therapy adjustment based on platelet function monitoring did not reduce the incidence of cardiac ischaemic events. Several critical issues regarding the design of these trials, which might in part have led to negative results, are discussed in this article. |
|---|