Body dimensions of the extinct giant shark Otodus megalodon: a 2D reconstruction
Abstract Inferring the size of extinct animals is fraught with danger, especially when they were much larger than their modern relatives. Such extrapolations are particularly risky when allometry is present. The extinct giant shark † Otodus megalodon is known almost exclusively from fossilised teeth...
| Published in: | Scientific Reports |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Other Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71387-y https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-71387-y.pdf https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-71387-y |
| Summary: | Abstract Inferring the size of extinct animals is fraught with danger, especially when they were much larger than their modern relatives. Such extrapolations are particularly risky when allometry is present. The extinct giant shark † Otodus megalodon is known almost exclusively from fossilised teeth. Estimates of † O. megalodon body size have been made from its teeth, using the great white shark ( Carcharodon carcharias ) as the only modern analogue. This can be problematic as the two species likely belong to different families, and the position of the † Otodus lineage within Lamniformes is unclear. Here, we infer † O. megalodon body dimensions based on anatomical measurements of five ecologically and physiologically similar extant lamniforms: Carcharodon carcharias , Isurus oxyrinchus , Isurus paucus , Lamna ditropis and Lamna nasus . We first assessed for allometry in all analogues using linear regressions and geometric morphometric analyses. Finding no evidence of allometry, we made morphological extrapolations to infer body dimensions of † O. megalodon at different sizes. Our results suggest that a 16 m † O. megalodon likely had a head ~ 4.65 m long, a dorsal fin ~ 1.62 m tall and a tail ~ 3.85 m high. Morphometric analyses further suggest that its dorsal and caudal fins were adapted for swift predatory locomotion and long-swimming periods. |
|---|