P100: A needs assessment to guide the development of multidisciplinary simulation-based modules relevant to emergency department nurses in Newfoundland and Labrador

• Published in: CJEM
• Main Authors: Smith, S., Bursey, K., Parsons, M.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Springer Science and Business Media LLC 2019
• Subjects: Emergency Medicine; Newfoundland
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cem.2019.291; https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S1481803519002914

Introduction : Efficient multidisciplinary team dynamics are crucial to the provision of optimal ED care. Physicians and nurses must use a collaborative approach to meet patient needs in this busy setting. This is especially important for high-acuity low-occurrence (HALO) procedures and clinical encounters. Simulation provides a safe environment where learning is enhanced through deliberate practice. Multidisciplinary participation in simulation-based education may augment team cohesiveness and performance. Methods : A web-based needs assessment survey was distributed to ED nurses, collecting information on demographics, opinions about simulation-based instruction and perceptions on the value of the proposed collaborative educational approach of the project. Experience and comfort with nursing roles in specific procedures (TV pacer, surgical airway, chest tube, central line, sedation) and clinical encounters (STEMI, CVA, sepsis, anaphylaxis, GI bleed) seen in the ED were also assessed. There were a number of suggestions for topics in addition to those listed. Responses will guide the collaborative development of simulation modules with nursing colleagues on desired topics. Results : 58/97 potential nurse participants from 2 urban ED's responded to the survey over an 8-week period, giving a response rate of 58.8%. 76% of respondents had less than 10 years of ED nursing experience, and 34.48% less than 5 years. Responses indicate limited familiarity with simulation-based education (SBE) on ED scenarios with 33.93% being not familiar; 55.36% somewhat familiar. Most prior simulation experience was with role-playing (82%) or low-fidelity setups (42%). Perceived benefit of SBE sessions was substantial (43.86%- very significant; 45.61%- significant). Most respondents had limited past exposure (22.81%- none; 64.91%- 1-5 sims). Similarly, there was little ongoing participation in SBE events with none in 43.64% and 40% just annually. For the 5 clinical scenarios, average responses were: Comfort with assisting 87.45%; Interest in further training 91.43%; Willingness to participate 94.13%. For the 5 procedures, averages were 36.35% (21.36% excluding sedation), 91.27%, 89.09%, respectively. Conclusion : Results indicate a low level of familiarity, experience and ongoing exposure with SBE relating to ED training and practice. Participants recognize the potential benefits of using simulation in a multidisciplinary educational setting and indicate a willingness to participate in collaborative teaching sessions.