Carbon accumulation in permafrost peatlands in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut, Canada

Average long-term apparent rates of carbon (C) accumulation (LARCA) were estimated for four peat cores from Arctic and Subarctic Canada. Detailed analyses of dry bulk-density and C content were used to determine variations in C accumulation rates throughout the cores. LARCA range from 12.5 to 16.5 g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Holocene
Main Authors: Vardy, S. R., Warner, B. G., Turunen, J., Aravena, R.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2000
Subjects:
Ice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/095968300671749538
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1191/095968300671749538
Description
Summary:Average long-term apparent rates of carbon (C) accumulation (LARCA) were estimated for four peat cores from Arctic and Subarctic Canada. Detailed analyses of dry bulk-density and C content were used to determine variations in C accumulation rates throughout the cores. LARCA range from 12.5 to 16.5 g C m -2 yr -1 over the past 6700-10000 years. Rates are lower for the surface layers of Arctic high-centred peat polygons, at 5.3 to 7.1 g C m -2 yr -1 for the last 3500-4500 years. By comparison, the rate for the near-surface peat from a Sphagnum fuscum hummock in the high Subarctic was considerably higher, at 24.1 g C m -2 yr -1 . The highest carbon accumulation rates were from core segments older than 4500 BP, which represent fen stages according to palaeoecological analysis. The average LARCA in our study are considerably lower than recent estimates of average carbon accumulation in Boreal peatlands. This difference is attributable partly to lower carbon percentages in our cores compared to the mean or estimated values of 50 to 51.7% used in those studies. Another factor is the presence of ground ice, which exaggerates the apparent peat depth and leads to erroneously high values if cumulative carbon estimates are based on depth. Using cumulative dry bulk-density, as we have done, eliminates the influence of ground ice and thus makes more accurate estimates possible.