E-therapists’ views on the acceptability and feasibility of an internet-administered, guided, low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: A qualitative study

• Published in: DIGITAL HEALTH
• Main Authors: Reuther, Christina, Lundgren, Johan, Gottvall, Maria, Ljungberg, Johan, Woodford, Joanne, Essen, Louise von
• Other Authors: Vetenskapsrådet, Barncancerfonden, Cancerfonden
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: SAGE Publications 2024
• Subjects: Portal The; The Portal; ejder
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076241260513; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20552076241260513; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/20552076241260513

Background Childhood cancer treatment completion can be a period of vulnerability for parents and is associated with mental health difficulties such as depression and anxiety. We developed an internet-administered, guided, low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy-based self-help intervention (EJDeR) for parents delivered on the U-CARE-portal (Portal). The acceptability and feasibility of EJDeR and study procedures were examined using a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE). Results indicated that EJDeR and ENGAGE study procedures are acceptable and feasible, however, a need for clinical and technical modifications to EJDeR and refinements to ENGAGE study procedures was identified. Objectives This study aimed to explore the acceptability and feasibility of EJDeR and ENGAGE study procedures from the perspective of e-therapists to inform clinical and technical modifications to EJDeR and refinements to study procedures prior to progression to a superiority randomised controlled trial. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 e-therapists. Data were analysed using manifest content analysis. Results We identified three categories relating to the acceptability and feasibility of EJDeR: (a) Support to e-therapists (subcategories: Clinical supervision and Technical difficulties); (b) Guidance to parents (subcategories: Support protocols and Synchronous communication); and (c) Content (subcategories: Relevancy of the intervention and Pacing of the intervention). We identified four categories relating to the acceptability and feasibility of study procedures: (a) Recruitment and training of e-therapists (subcategories: Definition of the role and Training program); (b) Retention of parents (subcategories: Parent suitability and screening and Frequency of weekly Portal assessments); (c) Retention of e-therapists (subcategories: Administrative requirements and Communication with the research team); and (d) The Portal. Conclusions EJDeR and study procedures were considered acceptable and feasible, however, ...