Spatial and seasonal foraging patterns drive diet differences among north Pacific resident killer whale populations

• Published in: Royal Society Open Science
• Main Authors: Van Cise, Amy M., Hanson, M. Bradley, Emmons, Candice, Olsen, Dan, Matkin, Craig O., Wells, Abigail H., Parsons, Kim M.
• Other Authors: U.S. Marine Mammal Commission, Exxon Valdez Trustee Council, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, SeaWorld, Shell, National Fish and Wildlife Federation
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: The Royal Society 2024
• Subjects: Pacific; Killer Whale; Alaska; Killer whale
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240445; https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.240445; https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full-xml/10.1098/rsos.240445

Highly social top marine predators, including many cetaceans, exhibit culturally learned ecological behaviours such as diet preference and foraging strategy that can affect their resilience to competition or anthropogenic impacts. When these species are also endangered, conservation efforts require management strategies based on a comprehensive understanding of the variability in these behaviours. In the northeast Pacific Ocean, three partially sympatric populations of resident killer whales occupy coastal ecosystems from California to Alaska. One population (southern resident killer whales) is endangered, while another (southern Alaska resident killer whales) has exhibited positive abundance trends for the last several decades. Using 185 faecal samples collected from both populations between 2011 and 2021, we compare variability in diet preference to provide insight into differences in foraging patterns that may be linked with the relative success and decline of these populations. We find broad similarities in the diet of the two populations, with differences arising from spatiotemporal and social variability in resource use patterns, especially in the timing of shifts between target prey species. The results described here highlight the importance of comprehensive longitudinal monitoring of foraging ecology to inform management strategies for endangered, highly social top marine predators.