A comparative test of inequity aversion in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and dingoes (Canis dingo)

• Published in: PLOS ONE
• Main Author: McAuliffe, Katherine
• Other Authors: Clegg, Simon, department of human evolutionary biology
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
• Subjects: Canis lupus
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255885

Despite much recent empirical work on inequity aversion in nonhuman species, many questions remain about its distribution across taxa and the factors that shape its evolution and expression. Past work suggests that domestic dogs ( Canis familiaris ) and wolves ( Canis lupus ) are averse to inequitable resource distributions in contexts that call upon some degree of training such as ‘give paw’ and ‘buzzer press’ tasks. However, it is unclear whether inequity aversion appears in other canid species and in other experimental contexts. Using a novel inequity aversion task that does not require specific training, this study helps address these gaps by investigating inequity aversion in domestic dogs and a closely related but non-domesticated canid, the dingo ( Canis dingo ). Subjects were presented with equal and unequal reward distributions and given the opportunity to approach or refuse to approach allocations. Measures of interest were (1) subjects’ refusal to approach when getting no food; (2) approach latency; and (3) social referencing. None of these measures differed systematically across the inequity condition and control conditions in either dogs or dingoes. These findings add to the growing literature on inequity aversion in canids, providing data from a new species and a new experimental context. Additionally, they raise questions about the experimental features that must be in place for inequity aversion to appear in canids.