Foraging activity of harbour porpoises around a bottom-gillnet in a coastal fishing ground, under the risk of bycatch

Bycatch of harbour porpoises ( Phocoena phocoena ) by gillnets is a recognised threat to populations. To develop effective mitigation measures, understanding the mechanics of bycatch is essential. Previous studies in experimental conditions suggested foraging activity is an important factor influenc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLOS ONE
Main Authors: Maeda, Saki, Sakurai, Kenji, Akamatsu, Tomonari, Matsuda, Ayaka, Yamamura, Orio, Kobayashi, Mari, Matsuishi, Takashi Fritz
Other Authors: Halliday, William David, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246838
https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246838
Description
Summary:Bycatch of harbour porpoises ( Phocoena phocoena ) by gillnets is a recognised threat to populations. To develop effective mitigation measures, understanding the mechanics of bycatch is essential. Previous studies in experimental conditions suggested foraging activity is an important factor influencing porpoises’ reaction to gillnets. We acoustically observed the behaviour of wild harbour porpoises around a bottom-gillnet set-up in a commercial fishing ground, especially foraging activity. Passive acoustic event recorders (A-tags) were fixed to the ends of the gillnet, and recorded for 1 392 hours. Although harbour porpoises frequently and repeatedly appeared around the net each day, incidental bycatch occurred only three times during the observations. The stomach contents of two individuals contained mainly Ammodytes sp., which were observable around the bottom-gillnet but not targeted by the fishery. A total of 276 foraging incidents were acoustically detected, and 78.2% of the foraging activity was in the bottom layer (deeper than 25 m). Porpoises appeared around the net with more frequency on the day of a bycatch incident than on the days without bycatch. These results suggest that the harbour porpoises appeared around the bottom-gillnet to forage on fish distributed in the fishing ground, but not captured by this bottom-gillnet. Thus, porpoises face the risk of becoming entangled when foraging near a gillnet, with the probability of bycatch simply increasing with the length of time spent near the net. Bycatch mitigation measures are discussed.