Near-perihelion activity of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko. A first attempt of non-static analysis

ABSTRACT The observed rate of water production of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko near its perihelion can be approximated by a very steep power function of the heliocentric distance. Widely used thermophysical models based on a static dust layer on top of the icy/refractory matrix are poorly consist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Main Authors: Skorov, Yu, Keller, H U, Mottola, S, Hartogh, P
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa865
http://academic.oup.com/mnras/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/mnras/staa865/33009774/staa865.pdf
http://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/494/3/3310/33137597/staa865.pdf
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT The observed rate of water production of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko near its perihelion can be approximated by a very steep power function of the heliocentric distance. Widely used thermophysical models based on a static dust layer on top of the icy/refractory matrix are poorly consistent with these observations. We analyse published model results and demonstrate that thermophysical models with a uniform and static ice free layer do not reproduce the observed steep water production rates of 67P near perihelion. Based on transient thermal modeling we conclude that the accelerated gas activity can be explained assuming that the active area fraction near the south pole is increased. The deeper penetration of the heat wave during polar day (no sunset) can activate sublimation through thicker inert dust layers. This can also lead to removal of thicker dust layers and consequently to an expansion of the active area.