Cloud cover and aurora contamination at dome A in 2017 from KLCAM

ABSTRACT Dome A in Antarctica has many characteristics that make it an excellent site for astronomical observations, from the optical to the terahertz. Quantitative site testing is still needed to confirm the site’s properties. In this paper, we present a statistical analysis of cloud cover and auro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Main Authors: Yang, Xu, Shang, Zhaohui, Hu, Keliang, Hu, Yi, Ma, Bin, Wang, Yongjiang, Cao, Zihuang, Ashley, Michael C B, Wang, Wei
Other Authors: National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Australian Antarctic Division
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3824
http://academic.oup.com/mnras/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/mnras/staa3824/34899643/staa3824.pdf
http://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/501/3/3614/35873744/staa3824.pdf
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Dome A in Antarctica has many characteristics that make it an excellent site for astronomical observations, from the optical to the terahertz. Quantitative site testing is still needed to confirm the site’s properties. In this paper, we present a statistical analysis of cloud cover and aurora contamination from the Kunlun Cloud and Aurora Monitor (KLCAM). KLCAM is an automatic unattended all-sky camera aiming for long-term monitoring of the usable observing time and optical sky background at Dome A. It was installed at Dome A in January 2017, worked through the austral winter, and collected over 47 000 images over 490 d. A semi-quantitative visual data analysis of cloud cover and auroral contamination was carried out by five individuals. The analysis shows that the night sky was free of clouds for 83 per cent of the time, which ranks Dome A highly in a comparison with other observatory sites. Although aurorae were detected somewhere on an image for nearly 45 per cent of the time, the chance of a point on the sky being affected by an aurora is small. The strongest auroral emission lines can be filtered out with customized filters.