Prospective Surveillance of Respiratory Infections in British Antarctic Survey Bases During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract Background The British Antarctic bases offer a semiclosed environment for assessing the transmission and persistence of seasonal respiratory viruses. Methods Weekly swabbing was performed for respiratory pathogen surveillance (including SARS-CoV-2), at 2 British Antarctic Survey bases, duri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Main Authors: Ganly, Katharine H, Bowyer, James C, Bird, Paul W, Willford, Nicholas J, Shaw, Jessica, Odedra, Mina, Osborn, Georgia, Everett, Tom, Warner, Matthew, Horne, Simon, Dinn, Michael, McMurray, Claire L, Holmes, Christopher W, Koo, Sharon S F, Tang, Julian Wei-Tze
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2022
Subjects:
Antarctic
King Edward Point
Rothera
Antarc*
British Antarctic Survey
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiac412
https://academic.oup.com/jid/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/infdis/jiac412/46658868/jiac412.pdf
https://academic.oup.com/jid/article-pdf/226/12/2105/47846851/jiac412.pdf
Description
Summary:Abstract Background The British Antarctic bases offer a semiclosed environment for assessing the transmission and persistence of seasonal respiratory viruses. Methods Weekly swabbing was performed for respiratory pathogen surveillance (including SARS-CoV-2), at 2 British Antarctic Survey bases, during 2020: King Edward Point (KEP, 30 June to 29 September, 9 participants, 124 swabs) and Rothera (9 May to 6 June, 27 participants, 127 swabs). Symptom questionnaires were collected for any newly symptomatic cases that presented during this weekly swabbing period. Results At KEP, swabs tested positive for non–SARS-CoV-2 seasonal coronavirus (2), adenovirus (1), parainfluenza 3 (1), and respiratory syncytial virus B (1). At Rothera, swabs tested positive for non–SARS-CoV-2 seasonal coronavirus (3), adenovirus (2), parainfluenza 4 (1), and human metapneumovirus (1). All bacterial agents identified were considered to be colonizers and not pathogenic. Conclusions At KEP, the timeline indicated that the parainfluenza 3 and adenovirus infections could have been linked to some of the symptomatic cases that presented. For the other viruses, the only other possible sources were the visiting ship crew members. At Rothera, the single symptomatic case presented too early for this to be linked to the subsequent viral detections, and the only other possible source could have been a single nonparticipating staff member.

Similar Items