Long-term temporal stability of Northeast Arctic cod (Gadus morhua) otolith morphology
Abstract Otolith shape analysis provides a robust tool for the discrimination of many fish stocks in the context of fisheries management. However, there has been little research to examine within-stock temporal stability of otolith morphology in relation to changes in the environment and stock condi...
Published in: | ICES Journal of Marine Science |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford University Press (OUP)
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz259 http://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article-pdf/77/3/1043/33104730/fsz259.pdf |
Summary: | Abstract Otolith shape analysis provides a robust tool for the discrimination of many fish stocks in the context of fisheries management. However, there has been little research to examine within-stock temporal stability of otolith morphology in relation to changes in the environment and stock conditions. This study investigated the variability of Northeast Arctic (NEA) cod (Gadus morhua) otolith shape between 1933 and 2015, using elliptical Fourier descriptors extracted from archived material of 2968 mature fish. Series of hierarchical multivariate models were developed to relate shape to the identified optimal windows of some environmental drivers. Differences between years accounted for <3% of the observed variation and no significant differences were found between the average cohort shapes. The models not only confirmed that fish growth was the strongest driver of shape differences, but also highlighted effects of temperature and biomass-related variables at different life stages. Extrinsic factors described only a small fraction of the observed variance, which indicates that environmental changes over time likely account for less than the natural inter-individual variability in otolith shape. These results suggest that overall shape remains relatively stable through time within NEA cod, which further contributes towards a consensus on the biological interpretation of shape differences. |
---|