Development of the large fish indicator and associated target for a Northeast Atlantic fish community

Abstract The large fish indicator (LFI) was developed to support the North Sea fish community Ecological Quality Objective (EcoQO) pilot study, intended to establish an operational ecosystem approach to management. Subsequently, procedures established in the North Sea were applied to the Celtic Sea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:ICES Journal of Marine Science
Main Authors: Modica, Larissa, Velasco, Francisco, Preciado, Izaskun, Soto, Maria, Greenstreet, Simon P. R.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu101
http://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article-pdf/71/9/2403/29148382/fsu101.pdf
Description
Summary:Abstract The large fish indicator (LFI) was developed to support the North Sea fish community Ecological Quality Objective (EcoQO) pilot study, intended to establish an operational ecosystem approach to management. Subsequently, procedures established in the North Sea were applied to the Celtic Sea to derive an LFI and target specific to this region. The Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) requires EU Member States sharing marine regions to cooperate using the Regional Seas Conventions, and using indicators already adopted by them. The MSFD explicitly suggests the LFI as a foodweb indicator, but it could equally well be used to monitor biodiversity. Here, we apply the established rationale to develop an LFI and target specific to the southern Bay of Biscay. Despite declining in the 1990s, the LFI subsequently recovered to near original values in 2008. Previously, relationships between the LFI and fishing pressure have involved lengthy time-lags. We observe a similar relationship, but with shorter lag. The nature of the larger species responsible for much of the change in the LFI may explain this difference, and might also suggest that, in the Bay of Biscay, the LFI is more appropriately used as a biodiversity indicator, rather than a foodweb indicator.