Quality of life in patients with pacemakers 12 months after implant in the Arctic Circle

• Published in: European Journal of Public Health
• Main Authors: Lopez-Villegas, A, Catalan-Matamoros, D, Peiro, S, Lappegard, K T, Lopez-Liria, R
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2020
• Subjects: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Arctic
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.573; http://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article-pdf/30/Supplement_5/ckaa166.573/33819347/ckaa166.573.pdf

Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to analyse the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients followed up using a remote device-monitoring system (RM) compared to patients followed up through conventional monitoring (CM), 12 months after the implantation of a pacemaker. Methods This is a trial design that used the EuroQol-5D and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF) questionnaires. The HRQoL of a cohort of 50 consecutive patients randomly allocated to one of the two follow-up modalities was measure database line and then during follow-up, 12 months after the pacemaker implantation. Eventually, 23 patients were followed-up through standard outpatient visits, while 23 used a remote monitoring system. Results The baseline clinical characteristics and health-related quality of life of the patients from both groups were observed to be statistically similar. Twelve months after the pacemaker implantation, both groups showed statistically significant improvements in the baseline parameters based on the MLHF. Conclusions The patients followed up through hospital visits showed a greater increase in MLHF- HRQoL after 12 months, although the increase was not significantly greater than that of the TM group. Furthermore, the frequencies of emergency visits and re-hospitalisations did not differ between the groups. Key messages Patients included in conventional monitoring group showed an increase in HRQoL after 12-months since pacemaker implant, although it was not significantly major than remote group. Frequencies of emergency visits and re-hospitalisations did not differ between the remote and conventional monitoring groups.