Novel cryoballoon ablation system for single shot pulmonary vein isolation: The prospective ICE-AGE-X Study

• Published in: EP Europace
• Main Authors: Tilz, RRT, Meyer-Saraei, RMS, Vogler, JV, Fink, TF, Sciacca, VS, Kirstein, BK, Delgado Lopez, LDL, Phan, HLP, Traub, AT, Keelani, AK, Kuck, KHK, Eitel, CE, Heeger, CH
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2021
• Subjects: Physiology (medical); Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine; Arctic
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab116.229; http://academic.oup.com/europace/article-pdf/23/Supplement_3/euab116.229/38130898/euab116.229.pdf

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The arctic front cryoballon (AF-CB) provides effective and durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) associated with encouraging clinical outcome data. The POLARx cryoballoon incorporates unique features which may translate into improved efficacy and safety. Purpose To assess efficacy and safety of the novel POLARx cryoballoon in comparison to the fourth generation arctic front cryoballon (AF-CB4). Methods Twenty-five consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) were prospectively enrolled, underwent POLARx based PVI (POLARx group) and were compared to 25 consecutive patients treated with the fourth generation AF-CB (AF-CB4 group). Results A total of 100 (POLARx) and 97 (AF-CB4) pulmonary veins (PV) were identified and all PVs were successfully isolated utilizing the POLARx and AF-CB4, respectively. A significant difference regarding the mean minimal cryoballoon temperatures reached using the AF-CB4 and POLARx (-50 ± 6°C vs. -57 ± 7°C, p = 0.004) was observed. Real-time PVI was visualized in 81% of POLARx patients and 42% of AF-CB4 patients (p < 0.001). Despite a certain learning curve utilizing the POLARx a trend towards shorter median procedure time (POLARx: 45 (39, 53) minutes vs. AF-CB4: 55 (50, 60) minutes (p = 0.062) was found. No differences were observed for periprocedural complications. Conclusions The novel POLARx showed similar safety and efficacy compared to the AF-CB4. A higher rate of real-time electrical PV recordings and significantly lower balloon temperatures were observed using the POLARx as compared to AF-CB4.