Quality of life measured in first-line therapy during the Cryo-FIRST study: a comparison between cryoballoon catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy

• Published in: European Heart Journal
• Main Authors: Chierchia, G.B, Pavlovic, N, Velagic, V, Hermida, J.S, Healy, S, Arena, G, Badenco, N, Meyer, C, Chen, J, Iacopino, S, Anselme, F, Kuniss, M
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2020
• Subjects: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine; Arctic
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0436; http://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article-pdf/41/Supplement_2/ehaa946.0436/34514023/ehaa946.0436.pdf

Abstract Background By consensus statements, catheter ablation is a recommended treatment for patients with symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), as patients try to alleviate the burdensome AF symptoms that reduce the Quality of Life (QoL). Yet, first-line treatment of symptomatic patients via catheter ablation prior to initiation of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) is only a reasonable alternative (Class IIa). Clearly, more clinical data is necessary that compares catheter ablation to AAD therapy in treatment naïve patients. Purpose The Cryo-FIRST trial was designed to compare AAD treatment against pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) while using a cryoballoon catheter (Arctic Front Advance; Medtronic, Inc.). This current data analysis examines the QoL endpoints when comparing AADs to cryoballoon ablation in patients with symptomatic treatment naïve paroxysmal AF. Methods This randomized multicenter trial enrolled 220 patients from 18 sites in 9 countries (Europe, Australia, and Latin America) in a prospective open-blinded endpoint study design. Patients had not been administered a class I or III AAD for longer than 48 hours for inclusion into the study. Subjects were randomized (1:1) into a cohort that was administered AAD therapy or a cohort that received PVI via cryoablation. The prespecified QoL endpoint at 12 months was measured using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) scores, and QoL recordings were taken at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following the index treatment. Results Of the 218 patients randomized (age 52±13 years, 68% male) 86% completed the 12-month follow-up. Crossovers occurred in 9% of subjects (N=20), including: 1 subject in the cryoablation arm and 19 subjects in the AAD arm. At 12 months, 86.5% of the patients in the cryoablation arm and 70.4% of the patients in the AAD arm where without symptoms (EHRA score 1). The mean AFEQT summary score was more favorable in the catheter ablation group compared to the drug therapy group at 12 months (88.9 ...