Trophic niche segregation in a guild of top predators within the Mediterranean Basin
Abstract Niche theory predicts that closely related and ecologically similar species with overlapping distribution ranges can coexist through resource partitioning, that limits interspecific competition. However, studies examining the mechanisms promoting coexistence of top predators at a large geog...
| Published in: | Current Zoology |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press (OUP)
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoae001 https://academic.oup.com/cz/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/cz/zoae001/56484347/zoae001.pdf |
| Summary: | Abstract Niche theory predicts that closely related and ecologically similar species with overlapping distribution ranges can coexist through resource partitioning, that limits interspecific competition. However, studies examining the mechanisms promoting coexistence of top predators at a large geographical scale are still scant. Here, we describe the foraging ecology of three sympatric owl species [Northern long-eared owl (Asio otus), Tawny owl (Strix aluco), Eurasian eagle owl (Bubo bubo)] in the Mediterranean Basin. We review 160 studies reporting diet information (212,236 vertebrate preys) and investigate among-species differences in diet metrics (diversity, evenness, prey size and proportion of mammals) and their variation along geographical and environmental gradients. Moreover, we test whether diet metrics differ in presence or absence of the other predators. All the three species mainly rely on small mammals, but they significantly differ in diet metrics. The smallest predator (i.e., long-eared owl) shows a higher level of specialism on small mammals (highest proportion but lowest diversity of mammals in the diet) compared to the larger ones. In addition, mean prey size significantly increases with predator body size (long-eared owl < tawny owl < eagle owl). Finally, interspecific competition results in an increase of diet diversity and evenness in the long-eared owl, and species’ diet also varies in response to environmental factors. The three species thus segregate along several dietary niche axes over a large spatial scale and according to both morphological characteristics (i.e., body size) and environmental variables. Such dietary niche segregation may adaptively buffer interspecific competition costs, ultimately allowing coexistence. |
|---|