Dunlin subspecies exhibit regional segregation and high site fidelity along the East Asian–Australasian Flyway

• Published in: The Condor
• Main Authors: Lagassé, Benjamin J, Lanctot, Richard B, Barter, Mark, Brown, Stephen, Chiang, Chung-Yu, Choi, Chi-Yeung, Gerasimov, Yuri N, Kendall, Steve, Liebezeit, Joseph R, Maslovsky, Konstantin S, Matsyna, Alexander I, Matsyna, Ekaterina L, Payer, David C, Saalfeld, Sarah T, Shigeta, Yoshimitsu, Tiunov, Ivan M, Tomkovich, Pavel S, Valchuk, Olga P, Wunder, Michael B
• Other Authors: Arctic Shorebird Demographics Network, Australasian Wader Studies Group, Bird Ringing Center of Russia, China National Bird Banding Center, Chongming Dongtan National Nature Reserve, Fudan University, Kansas State University, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Taiwan Wader Study Group, University of Alaska Fairbanks, University of Colorado Denver, University of Missouri Colombia, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arctic and Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuges, USFWS Migratory Bird Management Division, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Alaska Science Center, USGS Bird Banding Laboratory, Wildlife Conservation Society Arctic Beringia Program, Yamashina Institute for Ornithology, Zoological Museum of Moscow University
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2020
• Subjects: Animal Science and Zoology; Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics; Calidris alpina
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/condor/duaa054; http://academic.oup.com/condor/article-pdf/122/4/duaa054/35501891/duaa054.pdf

Abstract The degree to which individuals migrate among particular breeding, migration, and wintering sites can have important implications for prioritizing conservation efforts. Four subspecies of Dunlin (Calidris alpina) migrate along the East Asian−Australasian Flyway. Each subspecies has a distinct and well-defined breeding range, but their migration and winter ranges are poorly defined or unknown. We assessed the migratory connectivity of 3 of these subspecies by evaluating a dataset that encompasses 57 yr (1960–2017), and comprises more than 28,000 Dunlin banding records and 818 observations (71 recaptures and 747 band resightings). We present some of the first evidence that subspecific segregation likely occurs, with arcticola Dunlin wintering in areas of Japan, and other arcticola, actites, and sakhalina Dunlin wintering in areas of the Yellow and China seas. Observations indicate that whether an arcticola Dunlin winters in Japan or the Yellow and China seas is independent of their breeding location, sex, or age. Furthermore, observations indicate that ≥83% of arcticola Dunlin exhibit interannual site fidelity to specific wintering sites. This suggests that the degradation of specific wetland areas may negatively affect particular individuals of a particular subspecies (or combination of subspecies), and, if widespread, could result in population declines. Given the possible biases inherent in analyzing band recovery data, we recommend additional flyway-wide collaboration and the use of lightweight tracking devices and morphological and genetic assignment techniques to better quantify subspecies’ migratory movements and nonbreeding distributions. This information, when combined, will enable effective conservation efforts for this species across the East Asian−Australasian Flyway.