Use of traditional knowledge by the United States Bureau of Ocean Energy Management to support resource management

• Published in: Czech Polar Reports
• Main Authors: Kendall, James J., Brooks, Jeffrey J., Campbell, Chris, Wedemeyer, Kathleen L., Coon, Catherine C., Warren, Sharon E., Auad, Guillermo, Thurston, Dennis K., Cluck, Rodney E., Mann, Frances E., Randall, Sharon A., Storzer, Mark A., Johnston, David W., Meyer-Pietruszka, Deanna, Haller, Michael L.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: unknown
• Published: Masaryk University Press 2017
• Subjects: north slope; Alaska
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/cpr2017-2-15; https://journals.muni.cz/CPR/article/viewFile/13000/11248

Professionals who collect and use traditional knowledge to support resource management decisions often are preoccupied with concerns over how and if traditional knowledge should be integrated with science. To move beyond the integration dilemma, we treat traditional knowledge and science as distinct and complementary knowledge systems. We focus on applying traditional knowledge within the decision-making process. We present succinct examples of how the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has used traditional knowledge in decision making in the North Slope Borough, Alaska: 1) using traditional knowledge in designing, planning, and conducting scientific research; 2) applying information from both knowledge systems at the earliest opportunity in the process; 3) using traditional knowledge in environmental impacts assessment; 4) consulting with indigenous leaders at key decision points; and 5) applying traditional knowledge at a programmatic decision level. Clearly articulating, early in the process, how best to use traditional knowledge and science can allow for more complete and inclusive use of available and pertinent information.