Farmed fish welfare during slaughter in Italy: survey on stunning and killing methods and indicators of unconsciousness

Information on slaughter procedures for farmed fish in aquaculture is limited, both in Europe and in Italy, due to a general lack of field data. The aim of this study was to gather information on the procedures used to slaughter fish in Italy and to discuss them considering the WOAH and EFSA recomme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Main Authors: Clemente, Gianfilippo Alessio, Tolini, Clara, Boscarino, Andrea, Lorenzi, Valentina, Dal Lago, Tania Lidia, Benedetti, Daniele, Bellucci, Fabio, Manfrin, Amedeo, Trocino, Angela, Rota Nodari, Sara
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Frontiers Media SA 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1253151
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2023.1253151/full
Description
Summary:Information on slaughter procedures for farmed fish in aquaculture is limited, both in Europe and in Italy, due to a general lack of field data. The aim of this study was to gather information on the procedures used to slaughter fish in Italy and to discuss them considering the WOAH and EFSA recommendations on fish welfare. Using a questionnaire survey, data were collected by official veterinarians in 64 slaughtering facilities where 20 different species of fish were slaughtered. The main species slaughtered were rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss 29/64), followed by European sea bass ( Dicentrarchus labrax 21/64), sea bream ( Sparus aurata 21/64), Arctic char ( Salvelinus alpinus 14/64), European eel ( Anguilla anguilla 11/64), sturgeon ( Acipenser spp; 11/64), common carp ( Cyprinus carpio 6/64), and brown trout ( Salmo trutta fario L.; 5/64). The most applied stunning/killing methods were “asphyxia in ice/thermal shock” and “electric in water bath,” followed by “percussion,” “asphyxia in air,” and “electric dry system.” After the application of the method, the assessment of the fish level of unconsciousness was practiced in 72% of the facilities using more than one indicator, with “breathing” and “coordinated movements” the most practiced. The collected data showed a discrepancy between the available recommendations about the welfare of fish at slaughter and what is practiced in many production sites, but for many species precise recommendations are still not available.