Discursive construction of the legitimacy of a place marketing project: the case of North Karelia
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to theoretically explain the significance of discourse for the construction of the legitimacy of place marketing practice, and to illustrate empirically how this is done in a “genre of strategy”. Design/methodology/approach The paper applies a critical discourse...
| Published in: | Journal of Place Management and Development |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Emerald
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jpmd-04-2016-0014 https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JPMD-04-2016-0014/full/xml https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JPMD-04-2016-0014/full/html |
| Summary: | Purpose The purpose of this paper is to theoretically explain the significance of discourse for the construction of the legitimacy of place marketing practice, and to illustrate empirically how this is done in a “genre of strategy”. Design/methodology/approach The paper applies a critical discourse analysis perspective, and utilises a theoretical framework of four legitimation strategies of authorisation, moral evaluation, rationalisation and mythopoesis to analyse how the legitimacy of a place marketing project carried out in the region of North Karelia, Finland, is discursively constructed within strategic documents of the project. Findings Several discursive legitimation strategies were recognised. The authority of the project was constructed by referring to the organisational context of the project, while rational and moral legitimation strategies drew from hegemonic discourses of regional competitiveness, attractiveness and cooperation. These discourses were further connected to discussions of contemporary regional development in Finland and in Europe. Research limitations/implications While the paper underlines the significance of the “genre of strategy” for the discursive legitimation of place marketing projects, it points out that it does not extend to cover the reception or change over time of the legitimation strategies, that should be addressed in further studies. Originality/value The paper presents an original perspective on legitimacy of place marketing projects by introducing discourse as a central element in the construction of legitimacy. This is especially useful for critical purposes, as it allows the discourses that legitimise place marketing practice to be placed under scrutiny, hence opening up the possibility for alternative discourses to emerge. |
|---|