The embedded construction of price fairness evaluations: a case study of Air Greenland

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate how fairness evaluations are constructed in a B2B context. Design/methodology/approach This paper conducts a field study of Air Greenland and its internal and external customers based on strong structuration theory (Stones, 2005). The authors emplo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
Main Authors: Thrane, Sof, Balslev, Lars, Friis, Ivar
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Emerald 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-09-2018-3662
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2018-3662/full/xml
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2018-3662/full/html
Description
Summary:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate how fairness evaluations are constructed in a B2B context. Design/methodology/approach This paper conducts a field study of Air Greenland and its internal and external customers based on strong structuration theory (Stones, 2005). The authors employ context and conduct analysis to analyze how fairness evaluations emerge across four levels of structuration. Findings The paper finds that fairness evaluations emerge as a result of the interaction between external institutional pressures, agents' internal structures, and situated reflection and outcomes. The construction of fairness evaluations was embedded in contradictory institutional structures, where groups of actors constructed different evaluations of fair profits, procedures and prices. Actors furthermore worked on changing position-practice relations which shifted relations, external structures and affected outcomes and fairness evaluations. Originality/value This paper offers a conceptualization of embedded agency as emerging across the four levels of structuration. This contributes to debates in strong structuration theory through conceptualizing and analyzing how actors may be both be constrained and oriented by structures while reflexively adapting structures across the four levels of structuration. The paper extends extant pricing fairness research by illustrating how actors' construction of fairness flexibly develop fairness evaluations while responding to legitimacy and societal demands, including the needs of particular customer groups.