Decomposing the (seafood versus meat) evening meal decision‐making sequence

• Published in: British Food Journal
• Main Authors: Perrea, Toula, Brunsø, Karen, Altintzoglou, Themistoklis, Einarsdóttir, Gunnþórunn, Luten, Joop
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Emerald 2012
• Subjects: Norway; Iceland
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070701211273018; http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full-xml/10.1108/00070701211273018; https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/00070701211273018/full/xml; https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/00070701211273018/full/html

Purpose The evening meal is an important, regular event in the lives of many people and its daily practices lead consumers to develop habits that determine their food choices. The objective of the present work is to further investigate how consumers make choices by determining the stages as well as the content of the family's daily food (i.e. seafood and meat‐related) decision‐making process. Design/methodology/approach Twenty‐four families in Denmark, Norway and Iceland were asked to fill in a one‐to‐two‐week semi‐structured diary regarding any thoughts they had about the decision‐making sequence regarding their evening meals. Data were analysed by means of content analysis so as to gain insight into the main themes and distinctive patterns with respect to the four stages of the decision‐making sequence by identifying a number of codes and sub‐codes of high and lower abstraction level. Findings The main results were similar across the three countries. Planning was the most important phase of the evening meal decision‐making sequence, where Nordic respondents considered practical issues, and engaged in a more rational type of thinking, allowing cognitive aspects to prevail at this particular stage. The presence of rational thoughts was repeated in the successive stages of purchasing, whereas affective thoughts were elicited mainly during the later stages of preparation and consumption. Furthermore, the comparison of seafood and meat as choices that complied with respondents' demands and expectations revealed that the two food types were perceived as substitutes for each other; however, meat was considered a choice that respondents felt more confident with in terms of pre‐ and post‐purchasing experience. Originality/value This paper offers substantial insights into the factors that influence the decision making process, as well as the importance that consumers assign to those factors across most stages of the decision making process. This valuable, in‐depth information can only be collected by using qualitative ...