Simulation of Carbon Isotope Excursion Events at the Permian-Triassic Boundary Based on GEOCARB

Abstract The biggest Phanerozoic mass extinctionoccurred at the Permian-Triassic boundary and resulted in the loss of about 95% or more of all marine species. For quite some time, many kinds of abnormal environmental events were adopted to explain the abnormal reduction of carbon isotope at the Perm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Open Geosciences
Main Authors: Zhong, Y. J., Huang, K. K., Lan, Y. F., Chen, A. Q.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Walter de Gruyter GmbH 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/geo-2018-0034
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/geo.2018.10.issue-1/geo-2018-0034/geo-2018-0034.xml
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/geo.2018.10.issue-1/geo-2018-0034/geo-2018-0034.pdf
Description
Summary:Abstract The biggest Phanerozoic mass extinctionoccurred at the Permian-Triassic boundary and resulted in the loss of about 95% or more of all marine species. For quite some time, many kinds of abnormal environmental events were adopted to explain the abnormal reduction of carbon isotope at the Permian-Triassic boundary, however there still has not been a unified opinion. In this paper, based on the carbon cycle balance model of the earth under a long-period scale, the contributions of possible cataclysm events at the Permian-Triassic boundary to the carbon isotope records in carbonates were quantitatively simulated. The results proved that a single event, such as volcanism, terrestrial ecosystem collapse or another factor, was not strong enough to lead to the negative bias of carbon isotope at the Permian-Triassic boundary. Even though the release of methane hydrate can result in a comparably large negative excursion of inorganic carbon, this explanation becomes unsuitable when both the shifting Permian-Triassic boundary and the fluctuation record of other inorganic carbon isotopes in the early Triassic as a whole are considered. Therefore, it is suggested that the dynamic equilibrium between inorganic carbon reserves and organic carbon reserves was possibly disturbed by a superimposed effect of multiple events.