Intraclutch egg-size variation and hatching success in the common eider
Intraclutch egg-size variation and hatching success were studied in a population of Hudson Bay common eiders (Somateria mollissima sedentaria) at La Pérouse Bay, Manitoba (58°24′N, 94°24′W), to test the hypothesis that females allocate more nutrient reserves to eggs that are more likely to hatch. Eg...
| Published in: | Canadian Journal of Zoology |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Canadian Science Publishing
1993
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z93-075 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z93-075 |
| Summary: | Intraclutch egg-size variation and hatching success were studied in a population of Hudson Bay common eiders (Somateria mollissima sedentaria) at La Pérouse Bay, Manitoba (58°24′N, 94°24′W), to test the hypothesis that females allocate more nutrient reserves to eggs that are more likely to hatch. Egg volumes were calculated for 575 known-sequence eggs in 134 complete clutches of 3–6 eggs. In general, the length of eggs decreased linearly with position in the laying sequence, whereas the breadth of eggs followed a curvilinear pattern, the second or third egg being the widest. For all clutch sizes, the last-laid egg was the smallest and the second- or third-laid egg the largest. Hatching success also varied with position in the laying sequence. Pre-incubation failure declined over the laying sequence, whereas hatching failure (dead, infertile, or rotten eggs) increased. In all cases pre-incubation failure was the major cause of egg loss (84% of total loss). Overall, third and fourth eggs were the most successful and first eggs were the least successful. With one exception, successful and unsuccessful eggs were the same size within a laying sequence. We conclude that there is no clear relationship between egg size and hatching success, and that laying sequence per se has a greater effect on hatching success. Female eiders do not appear to allocate more reserves to eggs that are most likely to hatch, and we consider other proximate, physiological mechanisms to explain the observed pattern of intraclutch egg-size variation. |
|---|