Measures of breeding inequality: a case study in southern elephant seals
Inequality in distribution of resources is a key aspect of evolutionary biology particularly in relation to distribution of mates and copulations. Notwithstanding its important role, inequality is not easily defined, and its measurement is complicated by theoretical and methodological issues. Althou...
| Published in: | Canadian Journal of Zoology |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Canadian Science Publishing
2002
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z02-117 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z02-117 |
| Summary: | Inequality in distribution of resources is a key aspect of evolutionary biology particularly in relation to distribution of mates and copulations. Notwithstanding its important role, inequality is not easily defined, and its measurement is complicated by theoretical and methodological issues. Although the formal treatment of inequality has been mostly limited to the evolution of lek mating system, a methodologically correct approach to measurement of inequality is generally valid for the study of any kind of mating system. In this paper, we analyze inequality in a large set of southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina) harems. The observed distribution of fertilizations was significantly different from both the expected distribution with equal shares of resources and the expected distribution with equal propensities to acquire resources. We calculate and compare various measures of inequality, observing a wide variation particularly among unbounded and bounded indices. We check the effect of choosing a specific measure of inequality by considering the effect of two aspects of harem socionomy, the number of females in the harem (i.e., the total amount of resources to be shared) and the number of males associated with the harem (i.e., the number of competitors). The choice of a specific measure of inequality had a strong impact on the results obtained and should be considered a critical step in every study of functional and evolutionary correlates of inequality. Unbounded indices showed a strong relationship with both harem size and number of males, while no effect was evident in the analysis of bounded indices. This demonstrates that, in this species, the despotism of the mating system remains high even in large harems and with many competitors, i.e., the worst conditions for monopolization. |
|---|