Performance of manned and unmanned aerial surveys to collect visual data and imagery for estimating arctic cetacean density and associated uncertainty

Manned aerial surveys have been used successfully for decades to collect data to infer cetacean distribution, density (number of whales/km 2 ), and abundance. Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) have potential to augment or replace some manned aerial surveys for cetaceans. We conducted a three-way compa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems
Main Authors: Ferguson, M.C., Angliss, R.P., Kennedy, A., Lynch, B., Willoughby, A., Helker, V., Brower, A.A., Clarke, J.T.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2018
Subjects:
Beluga
Beluga*
bowhead whale
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/juvs-2018-0002
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/juvs-2018-0002
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/juvs-2018-0002
Description
Summary:Manned aerial surveys have been used successfully for decades to collect data to infer cetacean distribution, density (number of whales/km 2 ), and abundance. Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) have potential to augment or replace some manned aerial surveys for cetaceans. We conducted a three-way comparison among visual observations made by marine mammal observers aboard a Turbo Commander aircraft; imagery autonomously collected by a Nikon D810 camera system mounted to a belly port on the Turbo Commander; and imagery collected by a similar camera system on a remotely controlled ScanEagle ® UAS operated by the US Navy. Bowhead whale density estimates derived from the marine mammal observer data were higher than those from the Turbo Commander imagery; comparisons to the UAS imagery depended on survey sector and analytical method. Beluga density estimates derived from either dataset collected aboard the Turbo Commander were higher than estimates derived from the UAS imagery. Uncertainties in density estimates derived from the marine mammal observer data were lower than estimates derived from either imagery dataset due to the small sample sizes in the imagery. The visual line-transect aerial survey conducted by marine mammal observers aboard the Turbo Commander was 68.5% of the cost of the photo strip-transect survey aboard the same aircraft and 9.4% of the cost of the UAS survey.

Similar Items