Use of eelgrass beds (Zostera marina) by juvenile Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua)
Two field surveys were conducted in Newfoundland, Canada: (1) SCUBA surveys at four sites differing in bottom type and the presence/absence of vegetation and (2) beach seining at three sites containing eelgrass (Zostera marina) and no-eelgrass locations. Results indicated that eelgrass is used as a...
| Published in: | Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Canadian Science Publishing
1997
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f97-033 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/f97-033 |
| Summary: | Two field surveys were conducted in Newfoundland, Canada: (1) SCUBA surveys at four sites differing in bottom type and the presence/absence of vegetation and (2) beach seining at three sites containing eelgrass (Zostera marina) and no-eelgrass locations. Results indicated that eelgrass is used as a nearshore habitat by age 0 + Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). A subsequent laboratory experiment compared the use of patches of bottom substrates (sand, gravel, cobble) and artificial eelgrass (three densities) by age 0 + cod when in the absence and presence of a predator (an age 3 + conspecific). Before exposure to a predator, age 0 + cod associated with sand and gravel. With a predator present, in substrate combinations with cobble, age 0 + cod hid in the interstitial spaces of this substrate or in the patch of eelgrass when stem density was >=>720 stems/m 2 . In combinations with no cobble, age 0 + cod hid in the eelgrass regardless of stem density. Latency to capture an age 0 + cod was highest and the total number of age 0 + cod captured lowest in combinations with cobble or the patch of vegetation with 1000 stems/m 2 . In the remaining combinations, latency until an age 0 + cod was captured increased with both the presence and density of vegetation. |
|---|