Diurnal variation in acoustic densities: why do we see less in the dark?

Diurnal fluctuations in total integrated echo abundance and in vertical density profiles were examined using data from the Norwegian combined acoustic and bottom-trawl survey for demersal fish during winter in the Barents Sea. The total echo abundance was about 40%–50% higher at day than at night. A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Main Authors: Hjellvik, Vidar, Godø, Olav Rune, Tjøstheim, Dag
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f04-161
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/f04-161
Description
Summary:Diurnal fluctuations in total integrated echo abundance and in vertical density profiles were examined using data from the Norwegian combined acoustic and bottom-trawl survey for demersal fish during winter in the Barents Sea. The total echo abundance was about 40%–50% higher at day than at night. An unknown amount of fish was lost close to the seabed in the acoustic dead zone, but the systematic changes in the near-bottom vertical density profiles did not indicate that migration in and out of the dead zone was the major reason for the large diurnal differences in echo abundance. A more plausible explanation could be that diurnal changes in fish behaviour affect the mean acoustic target strength. Based on the present study, we recommend that the time series of acoustic surveys should be re analysed, taking the diurnal bias into account. Any comparison of the fish densities indicated by trawl and acoustic surveys will suffer if this bias is not corrected. We believe that model development utilizing this type of information is crucial for future ecosystem-based monitoring.