Snowmelt, glacier melt, and high arctic streamflow regimes
Most streamflow regimes in the high arctic have been distinguished as nival or proglacial according to the presence or absence of glaciers. A comparison of streamflow in glacierized and non-glacierized basins in a high arctic environment shows that runoff is sustained by various sources of water, in...
| Published in: | Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Canadian Science Publishing
1981
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/e81-127 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/e81-127 |
| Summary: | Most streamflow regimes in the high arctic have been distinguished as nival or proglacial according to the presence or absence of glaciers. A comparison of streamflow in glacierized and non-glacierized basins in a high arctic environment shows that runoff is sustained by various sources of water, including spring snowmelt, the melting of semi-permanent snow banks, glaciers, and rainfall. If spring melt dominates, a simple arctic nival regime results and if this is followed by summer glacier melt, a proglacial regime occurs. In some non-glacierized basins, however, if snowmelt is delayed until mid-summer or if semi-permanent snowbanks are abundant, a proglacial type of runoff pattern may be produced. The overall result is that various combinations of several sources of water will generate a suite of regimes that range from the simple nival to the typical proglacial pattern of flow. |
|---|