Volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits of the Dunnage Zone of the Newfoundland Appalachians: setting, styles, key advances, and future research

• Published in: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
• Main Authors: Piercey, Stephen J., Hinchey, John G., Sparkes, Gregory W.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2023
• Subjects: Rambler; Wild Bight; Newfoundland
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjes-2022-0148; https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/cjes-2022-0148; https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cjes-2022-0148

The Dunnage Zone of the Newfoundland Appalachians hosts diverse Cambrian–Ordovician volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits. The peri-Laurentian Notre Dame Subzone contains Cu–Zn–Au mafic and bimodal mafic deposits in ∼501–485 Ma ophiolitic rocks and Zn–Pb–Cu–(Au–Ag) deposits in ∼471–465 Ma bimodal rifted continental arc sequences (e.g., Buchans). The peri-Gondwanan rocks of the Exploits Subzone host Zn–Pb–Cu–(Au–Ag) bimodal felsic, felsic siliciclastic, and Zn–Ag–Au hybrid bimodal felsic deposits in the ∼513–486 Ma Victoria Lake supergroup; Cu–Zn bimodal felsic to bimodal mafic deposits of the ∼486 Ma Wild Bight Group; and Cu–(Au) mafic siliciclastic deposits of the ∼466 Ma Great Burnt Lake/South Pond belt. Regardless of age or stratigraphic hosts, all VMS deposits are associated with specific magmatic assemblages and extensional tectonism (i.e., rifting). Gold-enriched deposits of the Rambler-Ming district are associated with felsic rocks that formed via slab melting and subsequent melt-mantle wedge interaction, which likely enhanced precious metal enrichment in these deposits. Whereas many deposits exhaled on the seafloor, some deposits formed via subseafloor replacement of host units or as re-sedimented sulfides generated in sediment-gravity flows. Metals in the deposits were derived from leaching of underlying footwall rocks; however, Au–Ag- and epithermal suite element-enriched deposits show evidence for metal contributions from magmatic hydrothermal fluids. Sulfur in deposits was derived predominantly from leaching of H 2 S from underlying footwall rocks and from thermochemical sulfate reduction of seawater sulfate, with lesser input from bacteria-derived H 2 S and magmatic-hydrothermal-derived H 2 S. Despite recent research advances and historic mining, numerous questions remain unresolved and provide opportunities for future study.