Language Differences and Occupational Experience

Because Canada has a labour force composed of more than one language stock, it is of interest to ask what social organization has developed to take account of this pluralism in her work world. Such an interest may take two main forms. First, with respect to a language variable, differences in occupa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science
Main Author: Brazeau, E. Jacques
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1958
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/139089
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0315489000006605
id crcambridgeupr:10.2307/139089
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.2307/139089 2023-05-15T16:07:49+02:00 Language Differences and Occupational Experience Brazeau, E. Jacques 1958 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/139089 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0315489000006605 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science volume 24, issue 4, page 532-540 ISSN 0315-4890 1920-7220 General Earth and Planetary Sciences General Environmental Science journal-article 1958 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.2307/139089 2022-11-07T16:21:30Z Because Canada has a labour force composed of more than one language stock, it is of interest to ask what social organization has developed to take account of this pluralism in her work world. Such an interest may take two main forms. First, with respect to a language variable, differences in occupational opportunities may be seen as the sole problem of Canadian Indians and Eskimos, of French Canadians, or of New Canadians. Second, we may wish to find out how our different language groups achieve interdependence in actual work situations and with what consequences for society as a whole. It is the second approach which will be adopted here; in a sense it includes the first, since the problem of any group stems in large part from the ways in which groups act on each other. The groups to which I shall limit my discussion will be the English and the French Canadians, but my remarks will undoubtedly apply, at least in part, to groups who speak other languages. The view taken in this paper is that in our society, because English is the sole language which has currency in all aspects of social activity, people of different mother tongues have unequal opportunities for work. In a plural society, two consequences follow from the dominance of one language: a limited utilization of the potential skills of those who do not know the dominant language perfectly and a disengagement of the other mother tongues from important aspects of social reality. Article in Journal/Newspaper eskimo* Cambridge University Press (via Crossref) Canada Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 24 4 532 540
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic General Earth and Planetary Sciences
General Environmental Science
spellingShingle General Earth and Planetary Sciences
General Environmental Science
Brazeau, E. Jacques
Language Differences and Occupational Experience
topic_facet General Earth and Planetary Sciences
General Environmental Science
description Because Canada has a labour force composed of more than one language stock, it is of interest to ask what social organization has developed to take account of this pluralism in her work world. Such an interest may take two main forms. First, with respect to a language variable, differences in occupational opportunities may be seen as the sole problem of Canadian Indians and Eskimos, of French Canadians, or of New Canadians. Second, we may wish to find out how our different language groups achieve interdependence in actual work situations and with what consequences for society as a whole. It is the second approach which will be adopted here; in a sense it includes the first, since the problem of any group stems in large part from the ways in which groups act on each other. The groups to which I shall limit my discussion will be the English and the French Canadians, but my remarks will undoubtedly apply, at least in part, to groups who speak other languages. The view taken in this paper is that in our society, because English is the sole language which has currency in all aspects of social activity, people of different mother tongues have unequal opportunities for work. In a plural society, two consequences follow from the dominance of one language: a limited utilization of the potential skills of those who do not know the dominant language perfectly and a disengagement of the other mother tongues from important aspects of social reality.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Brazeau, E. Jacques
author_facet Brazeau, E. Jacques
author_sort Brazeau, E. Jacques
title Language Differences and Occupational Experience
title_short Language Differences and Occupational Experience
title_full Language Differences and Occupational Experience
title_fullStr Language Differences and Occupational Experience
title_full_unstemmed Language Differences and Occupational Experience
title_sort language differences and occupational experience
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1958
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/139089
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0315489000006605
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre eskimo*
genre_facet eskimo*
op_source Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science
volume 24, issue 4, page 532-540
ISSN 0315-4890 1920-7220
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2307/139089
container_title Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science
container_volume 24
container_issue 4
container_start_page 532
op_container_end_page 540
_version_ 1766403872100712448