Participatory action research with Inuit societies: A scoping review

Abstract Participatory methods have become essential for research with Indigenous Arctic peoples. To understand how researchers use such methods, we conducted a scoping review of participatory action research (PAR)—a classic qualitative methodology—with Inuit communities. Although other systematic r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Record
Main Authors: Hervé, Caroline, Laneuville, Pascale, Lapointe, Luc
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247423000128
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247423000128
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247423000128
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0032247423000128 2024-09-15T18:14:52+00:00 Participatory action research with Inuit societies: A scoping review Hervé, Caroline Laneuville, Pascale Lapointe, Luc 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247423000128 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247423000128 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Polar Record volume 59 ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057 journal-article 2023 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247423000128 2024-07-10T04:04:41Z Abstract Participatory methods have become essential for research with Indigenous Arctic peoples. To understand how researchers use such methods, we conducted a scoping review of participatory action research (PAR)—a classic qualitative methodology—with Inuit communities. Although other systematic reviews exist on participatory methodologies in the Arctic, our scoping review is the only one focusing only on the Inuit. We reviewed 11 empirical studies published between 2000 and 2019 in peer-reviewed journals. Most of them had been conducted with Canadian Inuit. Although the authors came from a variety of disciplines, the studies were mostly about the health and well-being of Inuit communities. The authors did not use the same definition of PAR, but their definitions did share some key components: Inuit participation, Inuit engagement and a goal of social change. There were also a variety of methodologies of research and forms of Inuit participation, although the photovoice method was frequent. Scoping reviews are most often used in the natural sciences. This one was a challenge because we were using it in the social sciences and because it concerned PAR, an approach with different definitions and uses. A remaining question is how to assess such a method, either by peers or by other stakeholders. Article in Journal/Newspaper inuit Polar Record Cambridge University Press Polar Record 59
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract Participatory methods have become essential for research with Indigenous Arctic peoples. To understand how researchers use such methods, we conducted a scoping review of participatory action research (PAR)—a classic qualitative methodology—with Inuit communities. Although other systematic reviews exist on participatory methodologies in the Arctic, our scoping review is the only one focusing only on the Inuit. We reviewed 11 empirical studies published between 2000 and 2019 in peer-reviewed journals. Most of them had been conducted with Canadian Inuit. Although the authors came from a variety of disciplines, the studies were mostly about the health and well-being of Inuit communities. The authors did not use the same definition of PAR, but their definitions did share some key components: Inuit participation, Inuit engagement and a goal of social change. There were also a variety of methodologies of research and forms of Inuit participation, although the photovoice method was frequent. Scoping reviews are most often used in the natural sciences. This one was a challenge because we were using it in the social sciences and because it concerned PAR, an approach with different definitions and uses. A remaining question is how to assess such a method, either by peers or by other stakeholders.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hervé, Caroline
Laneuville, Pascale
Lapointe, Luc
spellingShingle Hervé, Caroline
Laneuville, Pascale
Lapointe, Luc
Participatory action research with Inuit societies: A scoping review
author_facet Hervé, Caroline
Laneuville, Pascale
Lapointe, Luc
author_sort Hervé, Caroline
title Participatory action research with Inuit societies: A scoping review
title_short Participatory action research with Inuit societies: A scoping review
title_full Participatory action research with Inuit societies: A scoping review
title_fullStr Participatory action research with Inuit societies: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Participatory action research with Inuit societies: A scoping review
title_sort participatory action research with inuit societies: a scoping review
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2023
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247423000128
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0032247423000128
genre inuit
Polar Record
genre_facet inuit
Polar Record
op_source Polar Record
volume 59
ISSN 0032-2474 1475-3057
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0032247423000128
container_title Polar Record
container_volume 59
_version_ 1810452653178617856