Nano- and Microplankton Dynamics during the Spring Phaeocystis Sp. Bloom in McMurdo Sound, Antarctica
The seasonal development of the microbial food web in eastern McMurdo Sound, Antarctica, was investigated during and immediately after the 1990–1991 bloom of Phaeocystis sp. (Prymnesiophyceae: Prymnesiales). From 23 November to 7 December, which was before the appearance of macroscopic colonies of P...
| Published in: | Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
1995
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0025315400038170 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0025315400038170 |
| Summary: | The seasonal development of the microbial food web in eastern McMurdo Sound, Antarctica, was investigated during and immediately after the 1990–1991 bloom of Phaeocystis sp. (Prymnesiophyceae: Prymnesiales). From 23 November to 7 December, which was before the appearance of macroscopic colonies of Phaeocystis , both phytoplankton and Protozoa were low in abundance. During the Phaeocystis bloom (~10 December to 7 January), phytoplankton biomass was high and was dominated by colonial and singlecelled Phaeocystis , but other phytoplankton taxa, including diatoms and photosynthetic dinoflagellates, co-occurred. Heterotrophic nanoplankton and protozoan microzooplankton increased dramatically in biomass during the bloom. Non-thecate heterotrophic dinoflagellates were the most abundant microzooplankters. There was no evidence for inhibition of the microbial food web by Phaeocystis . By the post-bloom period, macroscopic colonies were rare and phytoplankton biomass had declined markedly. Microzooplankton biomass continued to rise until the end of the sampling period (23 January). Microfaecal pellets (median size range, 10–30 μm) were abundant during the bloom and post-bloom periods. In the post-bloom period, the heterotrophic protistan assemblage became very diverse, with numerous trophic linkages within the microbial food web. The abundance and diversity of the heterotrophic protist assemblage suggests that there was little control of protists by metazoans and that the microbial food web, consisting of bacteria, algae and Protozoa, was poorly coupled to metazoan zooplankton. |
|---|