Anisotropy of the Kinetic Friction on a Single Crystal of Ice

Abstract Measurements were made of the kinetic friction which occurs when a tungsten carbide ball slides in various directions on the surface of a single crystal of ice, the track width produced on the surface was also measured. Anisotropies were detected in both the friction coefficient and the tra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Author: Tusima, Katutosi
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1978
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022143000033773
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0022143000033773
Description
Summary:Abstract Measurements were made of the kinetic friction which occurs when a tungsten carbide ball slides in various directions on the surface of a single crystal of ice, the track width produced on the surface was also measured. Anisotropies were detected in both the friction coefficient and the track width. The track width φ was at a maximum when the ball was slid normal to the basal plane and a minimum when it was moving parallel to (0001) in the temperature range —5 to —30°C. Although the friction coefficient was at a minimum when slid normal to (0001) and maximum in parallel to (0001) at temperatures of —19°C and below, this relation was found to be reversed at temperatures of —10°C and above. Anisotropy in track width can be explained in terms of the amount by which a slip system contributes to deformation in a specimen. However, our understanding of frictional anisotropy calls for knowledge of the ploughing strength p defined by the adhesion theory of friction. It was found that p reached a maximum in parallel to (0001) and a minimum normal to (0001) and that the frictional anisotropy on (0001) was influenced by the value . A remarkable frictional anisotropy was also observed on the surface inclined to the basal plane at 30°; the maximum friction coefficient was twice the minimum, whereas the maximum track width was only 1.3 times the minimum.