South Carolina Interglacial Sites and Stage 5 Sea Levels

• Published in: Quaternary Research
• Main Authors: Hollin, John T., Hearty, Paul J.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1990
• Subjects: Antarctic; Little River; Antarc*
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(90)90081-u; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:003358949090081U?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:003358949090081U?httpAccept=text/plain; https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S003358940002038X

Abstract Amino acid and other studies have been made on the 30-km Pleistocene sections of the Intracoastal Waterway between Myrtle Beach and Little River, South Carolina. Our ratios differentiate the long-established Waccamaw (oldest), Canepatch, and Socastee formations. The ratios from the four laboratories that have worked in this area agree very well, and apparent conflicts with U-series dates may merely reflect an abundance of reworked corals. Our amino acid correlations with U-series coral dates in South Carolina, Bermuda, and the Mediterranean all argue that the classical Canepatch and its Horry Clay date from isotope stage 5e and not, as has been implied, from stage 7, 9, 11, or 13. Excavations and erosion have increased position-fixing problems along the Waterway, and “Canepatch” amino acid ratios and U-series dates (460,000 ± 100,000 yr B.P.) at “ICW5” may be from an older unit. The Canepatch shows the double marine transgression visible in many stage 5e deposits. Pollen shows that the second transgression occurred late in the interglaciation, and stratigraphic studies show that it reached 14 m. It therefore fits very well Antarctic ice-surge models of stage 5 sea level and climate. The Socastee adds to the evidence for one or more sea levels above 0 m late in stage 5.